InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 18860
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/21/2013

Re: None

Sunday, 05/19/2019 1:12:05 PM

Sunday, May 19, 2019 1:12:05 PM

Post# of 191892
Love the dialog today!

$VERB - Let me preface to clarify for those who may not have taken a course in business ethics or be familiar (it’s a very important issue in business today).

No business ever becomes immensely successful by treating any of its stakeholders shoddily. Whether employees, vendors, customers, consultants, financiers or shareholders, these constituents must “feel” good about their work and dealings with the company.

The reward for all is money/value. Whether that money comes through increased employee production, capital loans, financings or sales is immaterial.

So any company with a high degree of ethics/fairness and wanting “equity” wouldn’t have allowed one institutional investor to benefit more than others in this IPO.

Therefore, it would have been impossible for any institutional investor (outside of insiders) to grab 5% ownership of VERB during this IPO. The math doesn’t add up.

6,389,776 units consisting of a common share (and warrant to provide our treasury with $3.44 per common share.)

40 institutional investors divided into $6,389,776 = 159,744 common shares and 159,744 warrants (units).

Even if institutional investors held their common shares, they would each only have 1.5% ownership based on 20,000,000 shares authorized/outstanding.

We know many probably sold the share and reinvested that capital into another opportunity, while holding the warrant.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VERB News